America bought my eternal love and gratitude in Vienna, January 1957. I was a hungry and cold Hungarian refugee boy, and we had left Hungary with nothing and had no winter cloths. The American Friends (Quakers) opened big hangars where used cloths donated by Europeans and Americans was freely distributed. I remember the well ordered raws of second hand cloth, all out of fashion and all very used, obviously donated by people who were poor and had put quite an effort into keeping old cloths well preserved. (*). All was meticulously clean, spotless and neatly ordered. In 1957 Germans and Austrians were still very poor. My mother selected for me a German boy leather trouser, with a tie under the knee, already out of German and Austrian fashion in those times. I have never seen such a thing, I felt ridiculous and refused to use it. Then the American Army also opened a hangar with surplus material, all I remember I got a real, authentic, original green American Army jacket. No one can imagine what that jacket represented for the skinny Hungarian boy that I was in those times. A real American Army jacket. No one of my friends in Hungary ever had something remotely like that. It is difficult to explain now what it was for me. With that green jacket America bought
my lifelong love and gratitude. The CIA could not have done anything more effective than that to get my eternal, deeply emotional attachment to the Ameican ideals of democracy and freedom or whatever. Since then, my brain is hardwired to think of Americans as a superhuman, amazingly generous, benevolent people.
On the practical plane, soon I had to discard the green jacket because it was impractical, unusable, with many open slits unsuited for the cruel winter of Vienna. Maybe it was too big on me or it had been discarded as failed piece of equipment. I dont know how American soldiers could wear it in their campaigns. Although I had to discard it, it was AMERICAN, ORIGINAL, US ARMY. It made me almost happy for a while.
Now, having discharged my moral debt of gratitude, I'll say why we (non Americans) hate America. It is because
Hanit Kikos and Suleyman El-Abed.
The story started 15 years ago in the desert. Hanit Kikos was featureless girl from a poor Moroccan Jewish family living in a miserable, remote Negev development town. A fresh, 15 years old, black haired, olive skinned girl from the poorer Oriental Jewish communities. She disappeared having been last seen in the bus station on the main road. The police soon found a suspect, one Suleyman El Abed, Suleyman the Slave, a Black African beduin from one of the thousand
pahonim (illegal beduin encampments) in the Negev. Jailed, the police applied the most infantile but effective trick in the world's police book: the
medovev. A beduin informer was put in the same cell with the mission of earning his confidence. In a moment of weakness El Abed confessed to him that he was the assessin, and from then it was downroad, and he led the police to the place where he had buried the poor girl after brutally raping her. As usual in this country, the trial took several years and the man was duly sentenced to life. Justice had been done, innocent blood was not claiming for justice or vengance from Earth, life could proceed on.
But not in Israel. A group of indomitable civil rights fighters, all middle class European Jews, inspired in American political culture, started to agitate against the
racist police and fascist judicial system demanded the trial to be reopened. It was brought into the public's attention that the psychiatric diagnosis of El Abed indicated a weak mind, that is he is an idiot, but not such an imbecile that could not stand trial. The psychiatric report was very large, full of illl-defined pompous words, very confusing. Second, El Abed was a multilingual illiterate, he could not read nor write in any language, so his signature on the confession was worthless and illegal. He could not have read what he signed. Since a large portion of Israel's immigrant population cannot read Hebrew or Arabic (the official languages), a complex system of certified translators and notaries is used to make sure that those legal documents are valid. But the system is much attacked, specially in last wills signed by illiterate people from exotic origins. Third, the confession was obtained by the racist fascist piggist police using illegal methods, almost equivalent to sadistic torture chamber sessions, such as playing a confidence trick on a pure-hearted naive criminal. Ultimately it was the racist, fascist, Nazi judicial system that
had found extremely convenient that a lily-white (well, a bit swarthy) Jewish girl was ruthlessly raped and killed by an opressed, discriminated, powerless, defenseless member of the society, an African Slave or descendant of an African Slave of a goat herding Beduin tribe. The assimetry was too extreme, it had the smell of racism all over it. The justice fighters felt that the whole situation was wrong, had to be wrong.
If there is one thing that Israeli high classes cannot suffer is being accused of racism. The case was reopened at a higher circuit and El Abed, being the moron he is, kept supplying more and more evidence. The arguments were twisted and twisted again, all the usual socio-economic cultural etc. background themes were presented and largely debated in HaAretz, the exquisite intellectual paper we are suscribed to (thanks to wife). But there was no way to evade the sheer fact that El Abed had killed Hanit Kikos in a very classical sex crime. He had done it by the book. Politically very unacceptable and incorrect, fascist and racist, but this was a crime solved.
But no, our American style freedom fighters could not take the fact of an Israeli Black criminal (moreover, from the lowest of the low, a moron from the Beduin Slave clans). They agitated and pressed and called once more the system racist, fascist, corrupt, putrefact. The case was reopened once more and tried by Israel's Supreme court with the participation of all the nine Supreme Justices. Suleyman the Slave, once more, was tried and the sentence upheld. All the judicial instances had unanimously found Suleyman guilty, as he himself said he was.
Now, October 2007, a book has been written exposing, once more, the unwashable racism of Israeli judicial system. The fascism of its police. The intrinsical evil nature of Israeli society. Its guilt. Its badness. Hearing the writer's cultured, reasoned, academic arguments on the radio, I asked myself, what he is talking about? Half of the Supreme Court Justices are survivors of the Holocaust, hating racism from the depth of their hearts. The other half are representatives of Oriental Jewry, refugees from Muslim lands. There is an Arab Supreme Justice who certainly would not tolerate the smallest act or attitude of discrimination against his people. Obviously, the writer was living in a civil rights film, believing that Netivot development town in the Southern Dessert was Little Rock. He did not see Netivot police as it really is, as poorly paid poorly trained Yemeni, Moroccan, Afgan Jews trying to perform their work. He could not see that they were not racist White sherifs of the American South. In his fantasy world, the writer was defending American Negroes against an unjust society, against a deeply racist power establishment. American culture has infiltrated so deeply our society that everything is defined in American terms and American experience. We are all role playing in a Hollywood fantasy film. It was American culture that had caused fifteen years of agitation and sense of uneasiness. And this thing will go on forever, books and interviews will try to convince us that we are evil slaveholders, persecuting innocent Black Arabs, racist to our innermost. This is America's influence on Israel, and I dont like it. Presumably even the Beduins hate it and I dare to suppose that Suleyman The Slave's own clan would like to forget the whole thing, and are happy that the rapist moron is securely behind closed doors. They must be truly bewildered about Israeli society. Initially they had tried to behave following their traditional ways of solving a blood crime: they send respected emmissaries, proposed to pay a fair compensation (how much a 15 y.o. virgin was worth in the desert? 10 adult female camels? 200 goats?), they wanted to make a large, public
shulcha feast to show that a blood feud (that may have gone on for generations) had been avoided and the difficult issue had been settled. Thanks to American inspired idealists, the issue has been now irremediably confused and increasingly unsettled. We dont need American ideals, let us be what our fathers were and let us follow their wise ways. And I am not talking for the beduins, for Saudi Arabian beduins like Bin Laden, or for the Muslim world. I am a Hungarian-born Jew living in Israel.
Follow Up: The former Chief Supreme Justice has called for freeing Suleyman the Slave. She says that wants to reduce the charge to rape alone (no assessination). Suleyman soon will be a free Beduin Slave. We Jews are such an enlightened, liberal people that we cannot bear the mere idea of having Suleyman the Slave in Jewish jails. Pfuiia.
Next Week Follow Up: Former Supreme Court justice Miriam Ben-Porat has recommended that Justice Minster Daniel Friedmann shorten the sentence of Suleiman Abeid, convicted of murdering teenager Hanit Kikos in 1993. She based her recommendation not on a classical legal consideration and evidentiary law, but on another idea: public confidence in the justice system. This consideration was traditionally excluded from the legal world, but it is now apparently becoming one of the main factors in making judicial and quasi-judicial decisions - not only in criminal law. Ben-Porat arrived at two main conclusions in her opinion. First: The sum total of legal evidence found in the Abeid case, which led the Supreme Court to convict him of the murder and rape of Hanit Kikos, convinced Ben-Porat he was guilty of perpetrating the acts. "I would have signed the majority opinion," wrote Ben-Porat. Second: This was, in fact, only the court's majority opinion - there was no consensus among the courts which convicted Abeid. In his trial in the Be'er Sheva District Court, he was convicted of murder and rape by a majority of 2-1. The same was true of the second part of his trial, which was conducted after Kikos' body was found; Abeid was once again convicted only by a majority opinion. At first, the appeal to the Supreme Court resulted in an absurd outcome: Abeid was convicted of rape by a majority but was found innocent of murder, by a majority of 2-1. This outcome led to the decision to conduct an additional proceeding with a panel of nine judges. Here, too, the justices were divided: Abeid was convicted of murder by a majority of six of the nine justices, and of rape by a majority of seven. Although this is the end of affair (legally speaking), the public found it difficult to accept the fact that three Supreme Court justices thought he should acquitted of murder - but he would nevertheless serve a life sentence. "Anyone who is not a legal expert is certainly liable to get the impression that there is a suspicion here of miscarriage of justice," wrote Ben-Porat, "and it is possible that such a suspicion should be given certain weight, since justice must be seen as well as done."
My take of the former Supreme Court's recomendation: The Supreme Justice is totally convinced that Suleyman the Slave raped and assessinated 15 y.o. Jewish girl Hanit Kikos as charged. But court judges were not unanimous, there was always among the judges one that didn't agree with the sentence. As if this was not always so. Specially in Israel, where two Jews need three synagogues. This lack of unanimity could give the impression to the ignorant, malignantly suspicious public the idea that there is still some doubt about the crime or the process. In an astonishing show of lack of self-confidence, she says: Let us free the criminal. Better have this monster raping and killing more Jewish (or Arab) girls than bear the stain of racism. The issue that Suleyman the Slave is a disadvantaged African Beduin living in a holy-pure-lily-white Jewish state and therefore he is untouchable, is left unmentioned. Pfuiia pfuiia.
--------
(*) From the perspective of Kever Benjamin 2007 it is impossible to imagine the poverty of those times. Each morning I take the trash out, find very good shoes and unused dresses there. Cloth is so cheap that instead of washing or mending, people buys new ones. In those times, a shoe was an expensive porperty and was taken care and repaired to last several years. A good jacket was for life, and dresses were passed down from mother to daughter.
Also, looking at my image in the mirror, an old obese Jew, it is difficult to imagine that I was hungry till we arrived to Argentina in January 1957. I distinctly remember being very hungry in Vienna. Hunger caused no fear nor anxiety because I was within a stable family framework, but hunger it was. Also the Viennese children of my age (I was forced to start going to school the second day of our arrival to Vienna, speaking no German at all) were hungry and badly fed. I have never read about post-war years of mass famine in Europe, except in Holland. Holland is a very well organized country, it came out undamaged from the war, its field and industries working normally. Yet there was a famine. Imagine if rich Holland went hungry, how much more Germany, Austria, Hungary, and the terrible silent postwar famine of Russia that lasted well into the sixties. My wife has symptoms of hunger during her years of development, yet she remembers no famine. Hunger is a funny social phenomenon, it is invisible, symptomless and soon forgotten.