His latest comments deal with the sixties anti-Vietnam peace movement in America, that ended in President Nixon's resignation. He writes:
The demographic rise of the underclass resulting from the triumph of the 1960s counter-cultural revolution (caused and led by ethnocentric Jews named one by one by MacDonald) implies that European-derived genes and gene frequencies will become less common compared to those derived from the African and the Latin American gene pools. On the other end of the IQ reproductive strategy distribution, immigrants from East Asian countries are outcompeting whites in gaining admission to universities and in prestigious high-income jobs. The long-term result will be that the entire white population (not including Jews) is likely to suffer a social status decline as these new imnmigrants become more numerous. (Jews are unlikely to suffer a decline in social status not only because their mean IQ is well above that of the East Asians but, more importantly, because Jewish IQ is skewed toward excelling in verbal skills. The high IQ of East Asians is skewed toward performance IQ which makes them powerful competitors in engineering and technology. See PTSDA, [Ch. 7] and Lynn [1987] Jews and East Asians are thus likely to occupy different niches in contemporary societies.) Presently white gentiles are the most underrepresented group at Harvard, accounting for approximately 25 percent of the students, while Asians and Jews constitute at least half of the student body while constituting no more than five percent of the population (Unz 1998). The United States is well on the road to being dominated by an Asian technocratic elite and a Jewish business, professional, and media elite.
Macdonald "proves" that Jews were the originators of the sixties´s hippy, acid, freaky scene in America that, diabolically, caused the above described sad scene of White Americans hating to study maths and other hard subjects. Since I was very much there at the time and the scene, I am in a position to judge his interpretation of the happenings on the basis of my personal experience. I for one know that no one of the hippy scene ever imagined the future as it developed. I do agree however, that the antiwar movement was seen by many Americans (including the President) as a Jewish conspiracy, yes, a Jewish Communist conspiracy (as such it must be considered a total failure, because Viet Nam is a capitalist country today). But no one ever said that the sixties anti-war movement was calculated "to lower White people's social status in America", as Prof. MacDonald is saying. That is why I write that only a venomous, malintentioned Nazi could say such things. The pic shows an album of The Pink Fairies, my favorite English rock group (after the Beatles and Freddy Mercury) that grew out from The Deviants. They were active in the underground and psychedelic scene of the early 1970s. They promoted free music, drug taking and anarchy and often performed impromptu gigs and other agitprop stunts, such as free outside the gates at the Isle of Wight pop festival. Where was Prof. MacDonald in those marvelous times? Did he demonstrate against or he fought in the Vietnam War? Anyway, he collects the names of Jewish hippies and "proves" that the counterculture was a Jewish thing. He writes: The original impetus of the 1960s student protest movement "almost necessarily began with the scions of the relatively well-to-do, liberal-to-left, disproportionately Jewish intelligentsia the largest pool of those ideologically disposed to sympathize with radical student action in the population" (Lipset 1971, 83; see also Glazer 1969). Flacks (1967, 64) found that 45 percent of students involved in a protest at the University of Chicago were Jewish, but his original sample was "'adjusted' to obtain better balance" (Rothman & Lichter 1982, 82). Jews constituted 80 percent of the students signing a petition to end ROTC at Harvard and 30-50 percent of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) - the central organization of student {p. 77} radicals. Adelson (1972) found that 90 percent of his sample of radical students at the University of Michigan were Jewish, and it would appear that a similar rate of participation is likely to have occurred at other schools, such as Wisconsin and Minnesota. Braungart (1979) found that 43 percent of the SDS membership in his sample of ten universities had at least one Jewish parent and an additional 20 percent had no religious affiliation. The latter are most likely to be predominantly Jewish: Rothrnan and Lichter (1982, 82) found that the "overwhelming majority" of the radical students who claimed that their parents were atheists had Jewish backgrounds....if I remember well, the word was pigs. The movement, Prof. MacDonald, was anti-establishment, and unionized middle class was, at least then, establishment. Fat, well paid, secure, satisfied establishment. I was not a true hippy because valued study and work, but one thing I am sure, no one gave a f--k to what was going to happen fifty years later. We were to be at most thirty forever. But according to Professor MacDonald, we young Jews did not make scandal and got stoned to better get laid, but hear! worked, objectively, purposefully, to bring about the loss, by non-Jewish White Americans, one hundred fifty million of them, of their social status. And he says we did it!
Jews also tended to be the most publicized leaders of campus protests (Sachar 1992, 804). Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, and Rennie Davis achieved national fame as members of the "Chicago Seven" group convicted of crossing state lines with intent to incite a riot at the 1968 Democratic National Convention. Cuddlhy (1974, 193ff) notes the overtly ethnic subplot of the trial, particularly the infighting between defendant Abbie Hoffman and Judge Julius Hoffman, the former representing the children of the Eastern European immigrant generation that tended toward political radicalism, and the latter representing the older, more assimilated German-Jewish establishment. During the trial Abbie Hoffman ridiculed Judge Hoffman in Yiddish as "Shande fur de Goyim" (disgrace for the gentiles) - translated by Abbie Hoffman as "Front man for the WASP power elite." Clearly Hoffman and Rubin (who spent time on a Kibbutz in Israel) had strong Jewish identifications and antipathy to the white Protestant establishment. Cuddihy (1974, 191-192) also credits the origins of the Yippie movement to the activities of the underground journalist Paul Krassner (publisher of The Realist, a "daring, scatological, curiously apolitical" journal of "irreverent satire and impolite reportage") and the countercultural sensibility of comedian Lenny Bruce. As a group, radical students came from relatively well-to-do families, whereas conservative students tended to come from less affluent families (Gottfried 1993, 53). The movement was therefore initiated and led by an elite, but it was not aimed at advancing the interests of the unionized lower middle class. Indeed, the New Left regarded the working class as..."
It is quite possible that the evil MacDonald version of the events will take root and be added to the infinite list of imagined fantastic offenses of the Jews against the rest of humanity. I am almost wordless to describe the malignant absurdity of his history. Der ewige Nazi.
9 comments:
One has to separate the "logical corollary" of what McDonald says from what he actually says. The "logical corollary" of say Darwin's work on evolution is that the Book of Genesis is not true and therefore all Biblical religions are false, but that does not make Darwin an atheist or McDonald a Nazi.
One of the differences between a Nazi and a man like McDonald is whether they are careful to tell the truth or not - it doesn't take a Nazi very long before he starts to lie. Show me one Nazi that rigidly respects the truth?
I can say that McDonald's observations about high IQ groups in America today are absolutely correct. My son is at the University of Pennsylvania, an Ivy League school similar to Harvard and the demographics are just as he describes - the enrollment is something like 30% Jewish, 25% Asian (including both East Asian and those from the Indian sub-continent) and about 15% black or Hispanic (mostly "affirmative action" admits who would not otherwise be admitted). Once you get done with the math, that leaves about 30% for white gentiles, which is about half their actual representation in the overall population.
As an additional data point, recently I attended a meeting of parents and children from my area (including my daughter) who are enrolled in the somewhat bombastically names "Study of Exceptional Talent" (SET)conducted by Johns Hopkins University. Qualification for this group comes down to taking the SAT college admissions test before age 13 and scoring above 700 out of 800 on either the verbal or math section. Although in some ways the test is a trivial multiple choice test that does not go past basic algebra and geometry, the average American high school senior (to say nothing of 12 year olds) scores around 500, so a score of over 700 in a 7th grader is indeed a fairly good identifier of talent - they have been tracking these kids for about 25 years now and most go on to graduate education at top schools, academic careers, etc.
Anyway, at this gathering (and I should add that Philadelphia, where this was held, does not have a particularly large Asian population compared to some other areas such as California) about 20 families showed up and of those, about 75% were Asian. Of the non-Asian families, 3 of 5 were Jewish by my count. By the way, this may be more cultural than racial - EVERY SINGLE ONE of the Asian kids was first generation - some of the parents barely spoke English,all spoke with an accent. And there were clearly some driven types who must keep their children chained to their desks.
Now the idea of the Jews as a parasite that infects its Goyish host is not a good one, but regardless of the reasons for this situation, McDonald's description of the current demographics at the top is absolutely correct and one does have to wonder whether and when there will be some backlash here from white Gentiles - they seem to be getting the short end of this deal. Although if I had to guess, the backlash will be more against Asians than Jews. Except for fringe characters, Jews at this point (and Italians and Irish, Greeks, etc.) seem to be accepted and though of as "white" by most other Americans and not as foreigners. It would not begin to occur to most Americans except for a tiny fraction that the American Jews are "foreigners" who should be expelled.
Keep in mind, BTW, that SET is INCLUSIONARY, not exclusionary like Harvard and other Ivy League colleges that have to reject 90+% of their applicants nowadays. All who score above a certain level are welcome. So, if the Jews and Asians were missing, the meeting would have been a very small meeting (2 people instead of 20), about as small as the hopes for America's future competitiveness in the sciences and technology (which in the modern world also means future competitiveness in economics and warfare). And one clever Jewish or Asian businessman or inventor can provide thousands of jobs in their factories. One Hiroshima bomb designed by Jewish physicists can do the work of a million (mostly) Goyish soldiers. And increasingly, there are other places for people of top talent to go - many Asians are going back to their home country and Israel has a not insignificant American Jewish population. So hopefully the American Goyim realize that they should be thanking their lucky stars that they have been "invaded" by such "parasites" and not seeking to expel them.
By the way, you should provide linkage - McDonald's conclusions, in his own words, here:
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/CofCCHAP8+Ref.pdf
Also regarding the counter culture, there is no denying that Jews were prominent in it - Abby Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, etc. But then again, Jews are prominent everywhere they live, so it's not a big surprise.
One last comment - in some ways, McDonald sounds like a Marxist predicting that capitalism will collapse due to its own contradictions. In McDonald's version, the "proletariat" (the Goyim) will be impoverished by the success of the capitalist class (the Jews and now Asians). Here is what McDonald says: "Jewish neoconservatives readily accept a radically individualistic society in which Jews would be expected to become economically, politically, and culturally dominant while having minimal allegiance to the lower (dispro-portionately gentile) social classes. Such a society is likely to result in extreme social pressures as the responsible lower middle classes are placed in an increasingly precarious economic and political situation."
However, capitalism did NOT collapse nor were the proletariat impoverished in the West - the economy is not a zero sum game. In Germany (which as McDonald points out was much the same as the US today - the Jewish population of 1% controlled perhaps 20% of the economy) only when the economy DID collapse due to outside forces (the Versailles treaty, the Great Depression) was there the backlash predicted by McDonald and the communists. As long as the masses are fat and happy (and take it from me, the American masses are at least fat) they don't really care how many Jewish billionaires there are.
I said I was done with McDonald, but as I read more I am coming around to your view. He seems indeed to be a "National Socialist" in the true sense of the words, who has the idea that American once had a "European" civilization that was somehow collectivist and that the Jews, with their radical individualism, undermined by their support for the change in US immigration laws in the mid 1960s.
See : http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/books-Preface.html
and on his home page McDonald has a picture of Notre Dame cathedral, a symbol I suppose of his beloved "European" civilization.
Of course, most of the immigrants in the US now are Latin American (more "American" in their blood than Latin, so they are the real "natives)) and illegal, so the Jewish support for the change in immigration laws has nothing to do with their presence. And due to their Catholic religion, they are really a "European" influence. As for the Asians, they are truly the "model" immigrant group and their contributions to American society have been nothing but positive, their lack of "European" ness aside. If nothing else, it's a lot easier to get decent food - white America's "European" roots did not extend to its cuisine which tended toward English blandness.
I wrote that Prof. Kevin MacDonald was a bona-fide scientist and not a Nazi-style "race-scientist" charlatan. He is a serious scholar and should be taken very seriously. He talks to the American people's pain of being flooded by a mass of foreigners, and the fear of losing their country as they knew it. I do emphatize with Americans, but being the world richest country by far and the only superpower, I feel that their sense of this-is-the-end-of-the-world is a bit exaggerated. MacDonald suggests that all the bad thing happening are work of the Jews done to advance their ethnic interest. In his view, Jews are a hostile (enemy) foreign elite and have been for generations working on the destruction of America's social structure to better dominate it.
As for the Jews having opened America doors to any comer, my only comment is that when we needed it, America doors were tightly closed. Ships with German refugees were turned back to Germany. America could have given refuge to many European Jews, and could have influenced Latin America to accept refugees. If Jews dictated America's immigration laws, they did in a particularly self-defeating manner, causing (indirectly) the death of many thousands. And the fifties opening of America to the world masses did not benefit Jews, but poor Mexicans and their American exploiters.
Jews participated in the anarchist hippy movements of the sixties, mostly because that is where the action and excitement was. MacDonald presents the counterculture as another operation by the hostile Jewish minority, calculated to cause the destruction of American family and to better subject the next fatherless, demoralized generation to Jewish direction. That is nonsense, more taking into account that the whole counterculture originated in England. If the Jews were not suffering the most from the American reduction of birthrates, MacDonald surely would have accused the Jews of causing that ongoing demographic disaster too. I dont want to give him ideas, but America's fat epidemy clearly must be another Jewish trick, since Jews consume less junk-food. MacDonald may one day resuscitate the theory that the Russians, the Irish and other Nordic peoples's general alcoholism is also a Jewish thing, as it is well known that Jews are genetically resistant to alcoholism. Por favor !
I agree with you that the fears are exaggerated - American culture is tremendously assimilationist. The Asians will be assimilated too - see Bobby Jindal, the Indian (as in India, not Native American) governor of the deep south state of Louisiana. America may have discovered the secret to making the Jews disappear better than 2000 years of oppression and pogroms ever did - allow your sons and daughters to marry them, welcome them openly and soon the Jews will be so farmisht with the Goyim that nobody will know who is who anymore.
McDonald sites the Jews LACK of success in changing the restrictive immigration laws of the 1924-1964 period (which indeed cost many hundred of thousands, possibly millions of Jews their lives) for their current dedication toward liberal immigration laws now. What changed in 1965 to make the Jews suddenly successful in advocating for liberal immigration laws (25 years too late to save the lives of the Jews of Europe and by which time Israel was available as a refuge) he does not say.
I think, Anonymous, that people do not realize the power of MacDonald´s ideas. it seem to me that the great masses of young American Whites are not fighting hard enough to get an education, possibly because they are afraid to compete with the dedicated, disciplined Chinese, Japanese, Coreans students. I presume that they also feel that being WASP automatically gives them a higher status (having all those Africans, Hispanics, etc. around, it is easy to get that idea) so they dont need to punish themselves by working too hard. Americans invented the idea of self improvement (like the autobiography of Benjamin Franklin and Dale Carnegie's books), but may be they are having it too good to walk the extra mile. I am not sure of this, because as of today, America is the richest, more powerful, etc. the best country of the world.
Jews are prominent everywhere they live
Jews are not prominent amongst those seeking to preserve and promote European Ethnic Genetic Interests.
There's prominent, and then there's prominent. They're not prominent in paleoconservatism. They're not prominent in anti-Zionism. They're not prominent in proxies for European Ethnic Genetic Interests (fighting Affirmative Action, fighting the anti-freedom "anti-discrimination" laws, fighting mass 3rd world immigration, fighting the ethnic cleansing of European populations throughout the world, etc.).
In practical terms, the only political arenas in which Jews are prominent are those which harm me and my Ethnic Genetic Interests at worst, or are neutral to same at best.
In his view, Jews are a hostile (enemy) foreign elite and have been for generations working on the destruction of America's social structure to better dominate it.
Yes. And you and anonymous demonstrate that alienation and hostility well.
You're having trouble admitting to yourselves that MacDonald's point might be true. That's why the only defense you can think of is to attack the man.
You don't say, look, it's obvious we jews don't think of ourselves as separate, we don't resent and blame Whites today for the deaths of jews in the past, we don't dominate the media, the academy, commerce, or finance, we don't call anyone concerned with White genetic interests a nazi...
Because you do.
So instead of taking responsibility for the control you have and the things you support you instead fret that if enough people learn this truth it will be bad for jews. More than anything else that's what concerns you the most.
I understand that jews generally think this way. I know that Whites generally don't. Whites have a capacity for responsibility, and thus guilt, that in relation jews lack. The great jewish capacity is for rationalizing smearing, censoring, ostracizing, firing, or otherwise harming anyone who criticizes them. Silly Whites tend to try and remove the cause for the criticism.
Post a Comment