Elections are getting hot in America. One of the signs is the ferocious attack on Steve Sailer, a right-wing ideologist. Since Obama appeared in the scene, much before the media started to get interested in him, Steve was fascinated by his complex personality, and spent a lot time reading and analysing his writings and story. Now that Obama has progressed to the point that he has the Presidency at the reach of his hand, the national media started to use Steve´s research and to quote him. This is drawing Steve into national politics and his ideas are being attacked (which was to be expected) by ad homine arguments. Digging in his blog, they found some "incriminating" material:
Sailer’s website is rife with primitive stereotypes. On it, Sailer claims that Asian men have a hard time finding dates because they look “less masculine” than other men. Last January, Sailer labeled Obama a “wigger.” He’s a remarkably exotic variety of the faux African-American, but a wigger nonetheless,” Sailer wrote. “Even genetically, Obama, whose East African descent is apparent in his unusual features, has only a distant relationship to the West Africans who are the ancestors of almost all African-Americans.”The "crimes" of Sailer are having noticed the obvious, things that is very difficult not to see, but which is tabu to mention in public.
What do I think? I dont have to think anything, because I am not American and dont vote in American elections. I would think that after 20 years of being married to an echte African American woman, and having been member of an echte African American church, and having dedicated his professional life to improve Chicago's echte African Americans life, it is mean and cruel to call him a wigger (I never heard the word, but I understand it means hipster, a white person trying to behave like an African American). Of course, to write that Obama is not a real racial African American, when Obama's political fortune dependa on the African American vote, is a political attack, and it has the potential to hurt Obama and the Democratic party.
I find some more substancial aspects of Sailer's critique of Obama, like Obama's "World bank" philosophy of economic development based on "appropriate technologies", his activity as professional politician trying to channel State funds to welfare, and his wife's political job as race relations manager. Anyway, lets hope for the best that Obama will be a good President of the United States and the world. Steve Sailer should know better and never even suggest that Africans have bigger dicks than Whites and Asians. (Only a hatemonger, a racist, would suggest that.)
In summary, it is amazing that American politics is being fought at this infantile level, of whose skin is blacker or whose dick is bigger. But the fight's object is not children's play, it is extremely serious, it is for leading the world largest, best, and most warlike army. Lets pray for the best.
6 comments:
By the way, the press has finally caught up with Mark Ndesandjo, Obama's half brother:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article4406813.ece
I contacted Steve at one point when he was not mentioning Mark's last name on his blog (to protect his privacy, a very menschlike thing for a vile racist) and pointed out that you had already "spilled the beans" (this is how I first found your blog, BTW). Steve, in another typical "racist" act, wrote to you and asked you to take down Mark's name.
Now the cat is out of the bag:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article4406813.ece
in the mainstream media and there is no getting Mark's privacy back. Mark is guilty of capitalism - he is a speculator who must be punished, not a member of the nomenklatura in good standing like his brother B. Hussein.
Oddly enough, Mark, the clear eyed one and to me a much more sympathetic figure, has no chance of being US President (especially since he was born in Kenya). In Obama's book, Mark gave his half brother an unemotional analysis of his fatherland - a poor country that had no use for people with physics degrees. And of their mutual father - a drunk who went around impregnating women and abandoning them. BHO had no use for such realistic thinking - he had DREAMS for his father and got away from Mark at the first opportunity.
Thanks for the updating. All I can add is Why America cannot have better mainstream journalism? They always wake up half an year later.
Regarding my note above, please notice that I am kidding when I write that only a hatemonger, a racist, would suggest that Africans are better equipped that Whites. I meant to indicate the low level that the debate has sunk.
Regarding Obama, I would suggest Steve to write a book on the model of "What makes Barak run?" He has the material and the book may make him some money too.
I know you are kidding about Steve being a hatemonger. He is no more a hatemonger than you or I - he is merely a teller of uncomfortable truths in a politically correct society. I think he was attracted to the character of Mark (as was I) because he is a person who did not choose to make his (half) "black" identity the center point of his life and career - Mark is a professional human, not a professional black man. In the eyes of those in the "poverty" industry such as the SCLC, this is an unforgivable sin.
Professional Black Man. You may have meant a political specialist in bleeding public funds for black causes. This morning even The Wall Street Journal is appaled by Obama. I hope it will not develope into some kind of class clash.
Yes that is exactly what I meant - Obama's career qualifies him to be President - of Cuba. There is the capitalist model of wealth creation, as exemplified by Mark - you search then ends of the earth for products that you think people will want and then consumers willingly give you their money for that product (or not). Such a process is entirely free of ideology or race - no one cares if the producers of the iPhone are white or black or green or liberal or conservative - they just like the product. If your worst enemy makes plastic bags and sells them for a good price, you buy them anyway.
And then there is the redistributionist/ cargo cult model exemplified by Obama. Wealth is created by some magical process you have no knowledge of. In fact you are proud that you have refused to work in the private sector. The government then confiscates thru taxation (as large a portion as possible) of this wealth and redirects it to favored groups. Your role is an intermediary - you stand at the river delta channeling the stream of gold in the "right" direction according to the appropriate racial and political criteria, but what causes this gold to spring from the earth at the distant headwaters is a magical process of which you have no knowledge.
The Wall Street Journal has always hewed to the capitalist line and now under Murdoch can only be expected to be even firmer in their support, so it is no surprise that they have rejected Obama. The real question is why the bankers (especially the Jewish bankers) of Wall Street act against their own interests? It was especially disturbing to see the disloyal former Bush Treasury Secretary O'Neill sitting at Omaba's feet and licking his boots.
The real question is why the bankers (especially the Jewish bankers) of Wall Street act against their own interests?
Easy question, Sir. The capitalists will sell the rope for hanging them with. This timeless insight is Vladimir Lenin's.
I am specially intrigued by George Soros aka Schwarz Gyuri. May be my Father's diagnosis is applicable: We Jews are a mentally deranged people. (My father did not refer to Mr Soros but he was answering to my question why 60,000 young male Hungarian Jews accepted to be conscripted into the Hungarian Army allied to the Nazis without weapons, in the middle of a war. It was irresponsible and suicidal. The mere thinking of it makes me sick.
Post a Comment