A new and fresh blogger writes about the new reproductive system emerging very fast in China. Rich and powerful people is maintaining second and third wives, and one official (in charge of infrastucture projects!) had 140 concubines. This system in a population with about 30% more young men than women, may cause instability and revolution, according the blogger.
This is the reason why China will not become the next superpower. A growing population of woman-less betas is a recipe for anarchy and chaos. I predict that the current regime in Beijing will be toppled sometime in the next fifty years. And when the government falls, the usual suspects among the pundit class will cheer it as a victory for democracy and freedom, claiming how the Chinese “yoof” wanted to breathe free or some nonsense, when in fact, all it was was a bunch of horny young guys who just wanted to get laid.Nicely written, but wrong. First of all, the intense competition will surely weed out weak and mediocre males from reproductive privileges, leaving only the best of the best. It is an eugenic system, improving Chinese gene pool accumulatively. Western societies are dysgenic, so in a few generations we will be White trash for racist Chinese.
The blogger proposes that Chinese society will disintegrate and collapse under the unbearable social tensions of a few mandarins monopolizing reproductive privileges. That is wrong. There have been similar societies in the past and they have been not more unstable than others. Morocco, for example, in the nineteenth century, was ruled by a king with four hundred or so wives and concubines, and rich men proportionally provided. Paralelly, Morocco was famous for its prostitution, male and female, which served the whole Sahara. Arthur Koestler on the basis of the licences granted by the French administration, calculated that half of the women (of reproductive ages) of Morocco were engaged in prostitution. Overly male societies, like armies, like Argentina in the time of the immigration, were always well serviced by professionals and amateurs. The Chinese society before the Communist Revolution also had much prostitution and drugs. Hypergamy, in itself, will not destroy China. On the contrary.
4 comments:
"First of all, the intense competition will surely weed out weak and mediocre males from reproductive privileges, leaving only the best of the best. It is an eugenic system, improving Chinese gene pool accumulatively."
Chinese eugenics aren't moving fast enough to cull the excess men from the herd. China's out-of-whack sex ratio is the result of female infanticide that has been going on for centuries exacerbated by the One Child Policy. Beijing has only been actively promoting eugenics for the past couple of decades. As I wrote in my post, the most effective way that the Chinese could solve this problem - and the way nations and tribes have traditionally solved it - is to instigate a war and send the excess men off to die on the battlefield. This isn't going to happen due to the geopolitical and MAD ramifications.
"The blogger proposes that Chinese society will disintegrate and collapse under the unbearable social tensions of a few mandarins monopolizing reproductive privileges. That is wrong. There have been similar societies in the past and they have been not more unstable than others. Morocco, for example, in the nineteenth century, was ruled by a king with four hundred or so wives and concubines, and rich men proportionally provided."
Mate-hoarding by alphas in and of itself will not cause revolution - it is mate-hoarding COMBINED with an excess of men that causes revolution. Morocco had only the former, modern China has both. China has already experienced similar upheavals - the Taiping Rebellion was in part motivated by alpha woman-hoarding, as was the communist revolution. Both Hong Xiuquan and Mao Tse-tung enforced moral conservatism among their followers, which was part of their appeal. Hong would have assuredly conquered China had the British not intervened - Mao succeeded where he had failed. The Chinese people will survive, but the Communists will not.
I appreciate the link.
Hi Ferdinand,
You misunderstood. I meant the weeding out of weak and mediocre males from the gene pool, not physically.
Regarding Mao Tse-tung and the Communists, sexual democracy was for the masses, not for the elite. Even in the Long March, Mao and other leaders had wifes and engendered childen (Mao had a child who was placed with a peasant along the route). Foreign military experts of the Comintern were provided war wives. You may have also read about Mao's sexual habits, which would have put to shame any Chinese Emperor.
so in a few generations we will be White trash for racist Chinese.
We? Israel is doing quite well for itself and I don't mean any hostility by saying that.
They are improving themselves, we are not. The future is uncertain.
Post a Comment