Hoste appeared in the blogosphere about six months ago and has rapidly taken his position as the most rigorous ideologue of White Nationalism. In his latest article he examines and rejects the idea that
There are few forces that could so easily break America as the coming of white nationalism.The person who said that sentence argues that the formal appearance of White Interest Groups will be the coup de grace of the American State as we know it and its transformation into a collection of competing ethnic entities, something resembling traditional Middle Eastern states (as they were a hundred years ago, not as they are today. Today most of them are homogeneous one race - one religion - one leader countries). Hoste looks at the concept that white nationalism is having the effect of dissolving America, and answers:
He’s wrong. Immigration has already broken America. White nationalism is the only hope that part of what made the American nation great will survive somewhere.From my vantage point of Kever Benjamin, far from America and nearer to contemporary Middle East than the one that existed a hundred years ago, Hoste should be commended for daring to face the troubling suggestion that White Nationalism may bring about the breaking up of America and cause its final transmogrification into a multiethnic state where formal and legally recognized ethnic organisms compete for collecive's resources.
Hoste's response is that America ALREADY is a multiethnic collective, and that the non-recognition of this situation will cause the demise of the white ethnia. Taking it from Kevin MacDonald, he thinks that White people are ill equipped to thrive in multiethnic environments, and are specially defenseless against groups evolved in multiethnic states such as the Jews (and possibly - I am saying it, not them - against Indian upper castes). Hoste's hope is to organize whites as an ethnic entity - the way is White Nationalism - to have at least a minimum of hope of white survival.
From the ethnic border settlement of Kever Benjamin, things look different. Our minds were built to operate in small chimp societies, intimidating or exterminating the males of the neighboring chimp trouppe with the sole goal of marrying (following chimp rites) their fertile females. Our brain has great difficulty to identify female kin or enemy, our brain gets excited at the sight of any warm body looking even remotely human, we definitely have nothing against females of any origin. America's future is miscegenation a la Brazil. The White Tribe exists only in juxtaposition with non-white peoples. This massive coming face-to-face with non-whites is a recent phenomenon. One only has to read Dickens to see that he relates to Irish or Welsh as foreign tribes, at least as foreign as Africans are for Hoste's "Whites".
As to MacDonald's proposition that Jews, knowing that they were better equipped to thrive in a multi-ethnic society that Whites, transformed purposefully old America into a multi-ethnic society as it is now, I say bullshit. We Jews thrive in homogeneous societies as well or better than in multiethnic societies. It makes little difference. MacDonald himself describes how New Christians ascended in no time to the top of post-1492 newly purified Spain, a unexpected phenomenon that made Spaniards's jaw drop to the floor. MacDonald himself describes in detail how Jews, in one or two generations, became Germany's top class, and that happened when there were no foreign peoples in Germany and Germany was a White Nationalist's dream of a pure White Nordic country. Less well known is the outcome the contact of Sweden and the Jews: Sweden was in the 18th Century homogeneously as Nordic as it can be, and only a dozen or so Jews lost their way (maybe coming with Bernadotte - see pic., or trying to avoid Prussian military service) and settled in the country. They soon became Sweden's top bankers, industrialists, medical doctors. Conclusion (and now I have to start working) is simple: MacDonald and Hoste are to be commended for proposing rational theories and for being ready to think critically about them. They are a thousand miles above the average American writer on race. But they are wrong.