Hoste appeared in the blogosphere about six months ago and has rapidly taken his position as the most rigorous ideologue of White Nationalism. In his latest article he examines and rejects the idea that
There are few forces that could so easily break America as the coming of white nationalism.The person who said that sentence argues that the formal appearance of White Interest Groups will be the coup de grace of the American State as we know it and its transformation into a collection of competing ethnic entities, something resembling traditional Middle Eastern states (as they were a hundred years ago, not as they are today. Today most of them are homogeneous one race - one religion - one leader countries). Hoste looks at the concept that white nationalism is having the effect of dissolving America, and answers:
He’s wrong. Immigration has already broken America. White nationalism is the only hope that part of what made the American nation great will survive somewhere.From my vantage point of Kever Benjamin, far from America and nearer to contemporary Middle East than the one that existed a hundred years ago, Hoste should be commended for daring to face the troubling suggestion that White Nationalism may bring about the breaking up of America and cause its final transmogrification into a multiethnic state where formal and legally recognized ethnic organisms compete for collecive's resources.
Hoste's response is that America ALREADY is a multiethnic collective, and that the non-recognition of this situation will cause the demise of the white ethnia. Taking it from Kevin MacDonald, he thinks that White people are ill equipped to thrive in multiethnic environments, and are specially defenseless against groups evolved in multiethnic states such as the Jews (and possibly - I am saying it, not them - against Indian upper castes). Hoste's hope is to organize whites as an ethnic entity - the way is White Nationalism - to have at least a minimum of hope of white survival.
From the ethnic border settlement of Kever Benjamin, things look different. Our minds were built to operate in small chimp societies, intimidating or exterminating the males of the neighboring chimp trouppe with the sole goal of marrying (following chimp rites) their fertile females. Our brain has great difficulty to identify female kin or enemy, our brain gets excited at the sight of any warm body looking even remotely human, we definitely have nothing against females of any origin. America's future is miscegenation a la Brazil. The White Tribe exists only in juxtaposition with non-white peoples. This massive coming face-to-face with non-whites is a recent phenomenon. One only has to read Dickens to see that he relates to Irish or Welsh as foreign tribes, at least as foreign as Africans are for Hoste's "Whites".
As to MacDonald's proposition that Jews, knowing that they were better equipped to thrive in a multi-ethnic society that Whites, transformed purposefully old America into a multi-ethnic society as it is now, I say bullshit. We Jews thrive in homogeneous societies as well or better than in multiethnic societies. It makes little difference. MacDonald himself describes how New Christians ascended in no time to the top of post-1492 newly purified Spain, a unexpected phenomenon that made Spaniards's jaw drop to the floor. MacDonald himself describes in detail how Jews, in one or two generations, became Germany's top class, and that happened when there were no foreign peoples in Germany and Germany was a White Nationalist's dream of a pure White Nordic country. Less well known is the outcome the contact of Sweden and the Jews: Sweden was in the 18th Century homogeneously as Nordic as it can be, and only a dozen or so Jews lost their way (maybe coming with Bernadotte - see pic., or trying to avoid Prussian military service) and settled in the country. They soon became Sweden's top bankers, industrialists, medical doctors. Conclusion (and now I have to start working) is simple: MacDonald and Hoste are to be commended for proposing rational theories and for being ready to think critically about them. They are a thousand miles above the average American writer on race. But they are wrong.
19 comments:
You say that Jews "thrive well enough in homogeneous societies as well or better as in multiethnic societies." Yet the examples you then give are all examples of multiethnic societies. Besides, I doubt that either MacDonald or Hoste would disagree with you that Jews are extraordinarily smart, talented, and ambitious.
The example I used for homogeneous (Nordic) society was Sweden around 1800. A few Jews lost their way, maybe they came with Bernadotte or run away from Prussian military service or shipwrecked from Russia, I dont know, but they founded Sweden's commercial and industrial elite, assimilated and dissolved. Prussia was also a racially homogeneous country; its few Jewish subdits the creme de la creme of Berlin's intellectual life.
Jews were accused of many things but paradoxically, till MacDonald came around with his theories in the nineteen eighties, no one ever thought they intented to swamp nations with Third World coloured individuals. Till MacDonald, it was the French who had worked to degrade the White Race by stationing African troops in Saarland. Not even Hitler suspected that sending French African troops to befriend German maidens was a Jewish conspiracy.
One could argue that Jews still have an interest in immigration because -- although they can succeed economically in homogeneous countries -- they are safer from persecution and assimilation in multi-ethnic countries than they are in homogeneous ones.
Re Brazil, it has an advantage the United States does not: its people (particularly its poor) expect far less from their government by way of redistribution than Americans do. Where our poor get housing vouchers, their poor build shanty town favelas. One reason Brazil's economy and financial markets have done so well in the last several years is that Lula has been able to placate his poor constituents with a relative pittance in welfare payments, so he has been able to run a primary budget surplus.
J,
It's interesting to note that Richard Hoste's "About" page on his blog makes no mention anymore that he is supposedly a "Graduate student in Anthropology" like it did before.
Also, in his articles for the Occidental Observer, there would be a short bio following the article mentioning that he was supposedly a grad student, but now, no more.
I guess he was tired of lying and decided to give up his little charade to deceive others into thinking that he has academic credibility and respectability.
Hoste is a rank amateur - and nothing more. He's just a geeky blogger who just regurgitates what better minds and thinkers have written. I would not be surprised if he lives with his parents, reading books all day, with no career or future prospects to speak of.
-Ari F.
I too have my doubts about Hoste's purported background. Nevertheless I believe his perceptions of how american society is progresing are generally corect and certainly surpass the rubbish that passes for the mainstream media these days. His IQ is certainly on the right half of the bell curve. His views need to be taken seriously if standards of civilization in the west are to be maintained. Miscegnation would likely shrink the pool of geniuses required for complex, technological societies.
Salut!
"...lives with his parents, reading books all day, with no career or future prospects to speak of."
-Ari F.
Thanks for openness,do not lose courage, then you will be able to change your situation,of course if You want ;)
J.Flowers: Miscegnation would likely shrink the pool of geniuses? It is like saying that in Brazil there are no blue-eyed blond girls. Believe me, there are, there are.
Regarding the idea that Jews in a multiethnic society are more secure, well, MacDonald himself refuted that. He says that Jews did not enjoy their stay in Muslim multiethnic sultanates, and Oriental Jewry never developed to the level of the Ashkenazi average IQ.
I dont reject MacDonald's ideas in toto. His insight that the content of antisemitic accusations is irrelevant, that the real cause of hate is completely different, is rather deep. Applying this insight to his work, seems to me that his complaints that Jews purposefully flooded America with Mexicans and other Third World peoples should not be taken seriously. It hurts him somewhere else. Possibly it is envy.
The Islamic sultanates are not a good example since the people in those countries believed in an anti-Semitic religion.
It is Prof. MacDonald's example. Maybe I should have written Caliphate.
Believe me, there are less Blue Eyed Blonde Girls in Brazil because of all the race mixing.
Also, race mixing between races that are divergent in intelligence will reduce the pool of geniuses.
If Jews had an average IQ of 115 and Australian Natives had an average IQ of 65, then panmixia between those two populations would destroy the Jewish Race's ability to produce geniuses at anything resembling the clip they produce them now.
It is not necessarily the case that America will become Brazil, thankfully. The great majority of White Women still produce babies with White Fathers.
Statsaholic,
Yes, you demonstrated it.
But you misinterpreted my reference to Brazil. Brazilian population is not homogenous. Reproduction is not blind nor colorblind. Not at all.
Say that 1 million Portuguese emmigrated to Brasil till 1900. Now they are at least 100 million Portuguese descendants in Brasil. You should compare the number of geniuses produced by 1 million Portugese that never left Portugal, with the number of geniuses produced by 100 million (admittedly not "pure") Brasilians. OK, instead of geniuses say "blondes". I assure you that there are plenty of blonds in Brazil.
You are thanking that America is not Brazil. I dont know, my friend, if you should. I spent a year travelling through America (had free Greyhound ticket) and lived and worked in Brazil, but in the end I gravitated towards my own people in Israel. Brazil does not know war.
Addition: Instead of blondes I should have said blue eyed girls.
If Portugese population has about 10% blue eyed individuals, and Brazilians about 5%, we have 5 million blue eyes in Brazil vs 100,000 in Portugal. And Brazilians are mostly heterozigotes.
On the other hand, what do we care about the number of blue eye genes? Genes that have guanine instead of say cytosine. Big deal!
Brazil does not know war.
Brazil may not war against foreign powers, but it is infested with a lot of violent communists like Marighella and has ultra-violent favelas. Brazil is at war internally.
On the other hand, what do we care about the number of blue eye genes?
why shouldn't we care?
Despite the common perception, there has never been panmixia in Latin America.
See this: Latin America is not panmixia.
Latin America is not panmixia.
www.gnxp.com/blog/2009/11/latin-america-is-not-panmixia.php
It is very obvious to anyone from Latin America. Genes flow from the top down, like water...
"then panmixia between those two populations would destroy the Jewish Race's ability to produce geniuses at anything resembling the clip they produce them now."
A Jewish genius? There is no such thing. Jews produce many clever people, but NEVER true geniuses.
The Jewish convert to Christianity wrote about this subject:
"It is this want of depth which explains the absence of truly great Jews; like women, they are without any trace of genius. The philosopher Spinoza, about whose purely Jewish descent there can be no doubt, is incomparably the greatest Jew of the last nine hundred years. . . . The extraordinary fashion in which Spinoza has been overestimated is less due to his intrinsic merit than to the fortuitous circumstances that he was the only thinker to whom Goethe gave his attention. . . .
Just as Jews and women are without extreme good and extreme evil, so they never show either genius or the depth of stupidity of which mankind is capable. The specific kind of intelligence for which Jews and women alike are notorious is due simply to the alertness of an exaggerated egotism; it is due, moreover, to the boundless capacity shown by both for pursuing any object with equal zeal, because they have no intrinsic standard of value - nothing in their own soul by which to judge of the worthiness of any particular object. And so they have unhampered natural instincts, such as are not present to help the Aryan man when his transcendental standard fails him."
- http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html
"Hoste is a rank amateur - and nothing more. He's just a geeky blogger who just regurgitates what better minds and thinkers have written. I would not be surprised if he lives with his parents, reading books all day, with no career or future prospects to speak of."
Oh look, an ad hominem attack - they are so typical amongst Jews.
Post a Comment