Friday, January 01, 2010

On Racial Hate

Ted Sallis comments on The Strange Fruit that
While genetic interests, like all ideas, should certainly be subjected to rational critique, the absurd assertion that human groups have no interest in their own continuity – which goes against evolutionary theory – is way beyond the limits of rationality. Why would Malik promote such an idea? Perhaps the first sentence of this abstract holds a clue (emphasis added):

The term Darwinian fitness refers to the capacity of a variant type to invade and displace the resident population in competition for available resources.

Indeed. Given that Salterism can be viewed as a tool that the “resident population” can use to resist displacement by an invading “variant type,” is it surprising that a representative of a quite variant type wishes to delegitimize that tool so as to facilitate the invasion? Isn’t it in the genetic interests of the variant to deny the very existence of those same genetic interests when addressing the resident population, to disarm that population in the competition for “available resources” (e.g., territory)?
Well formuated, but I have reservations (see below). What confuses me is Sallis's footnote:
Note: I in fact have become skeptical of this, and a number of other, commonly cited “fallacies.”
What is the meaning of this?

Be it what it may, my reservation regarding delegitimizing consists in the observation that the Ted Sallis type of White Race Defenders and White Race Survivalists invest much effort in writing, speaking and demostrating their position, but they do little or nothing to actually propagate it. I mean, these people talk exceedingly on race and have one child, two big dogs and a cat. If they really meant what they say, they should have ten children and demand extra social security payments to large families. It is obvious that they are not serious, they are less into defending their race than giving expression to their venomous hate towards the other fellow who sems more successful - in this case, Malik. They are moved by yellow envy, not love for their race.



The people who actually are doing something to propagate the White Race, like Texas Mormons, Pennsylvania Pentacostals, etc. are the sweetest and least racist people in the world. (pic: a Russian Old Believers family)

3 comments:

MadIvan said...

the observation that the Ted Sallis type of White Race Defenders and White Race Survivalists invest much effort in writing, speaking and demostrating their position, but they do little or nothing to actually propagate it.

Must first find (white) woman for one to "propagate" bioligical interest.

What (quality) white woman desire sleep with Occidental columnist?

Anonymous said...

White survivalists are slowly waking up. But too slowly, and I agree there is much more said than done. Part of the problem is that, on average, whites are not programmed to look too far into the future, apart from the occasional Cassandra (usually subject to ridicule).

But when they finally decide they are genuinely threatened, watch out. This is why the "governments" in the West are so desparate to intimidate into silence anybody who points out the obvious dangers of our current situation.

Anon.

Eshenberg said...

Salut!
"...like Texas Mormons, Pennsylvania Pentacostals, etc. are the sweetest and least racist people in the world."
Oh,no they are major "racist" because they have "white" "racist" children and continue "white" "racist" "race"!
"Racism" free zone is where "white" don't marry each other and are the same as Madlvan!