In every human society till the early twentieth century only adult men had the vote. Women had many rights, including personal property (something that married women in Israel dont have - everything is shared). Female vote - which is less than a hundred years old - started a process of social decomposition that is leading to a total collapse of Western populations.
Let's make it clear that I am definitely against any oppression of women. I have absolutely no interest in knowing or controlling the sexual activity of anyone, male or female. That is one area that I dont care for. Everybody should receive the same pay for the same work, everybody should have every opportunity for advancement according to his/her ability and ambition. I am for granting most generous privileges to women, because they need a secure environment to have children and to care for them. Society absolutely cannot do without them. Divorce and abandoning a woman and specially women with child should be made prohibitively difficult. Women should have equal opportunity to become professors of physics as men and equal pay (and I believe they have it). In fact, if a Hottentot female can and wants to teach physics, welcome. Humanity needs talents of any size, gender, race or species. Moreover, post-menopausal women, lesbians and exceptional cases (basically, anyone insistent enough) should be granted honorary male status and political rights.
I think society would be healthier than today. And we would have better chance of survival and prosperity.
4 comments:
I agree. I believe in traditional gender roles with an allowance for people who are gender atypical (including but not limited to gays).
By making only those who actually pay into the pot eligible to vote we could sidestep the public relations hell
(similar to how only land owners had the right). Disqualifying public employees from participating would render female voting and the associated problems null, as you know most women do work in one way or another for the government.
What is wrong with women voting? Do they tend to vote for the 'handsomest' candidate rather than the best one? Do they tend to support bigger government and less freedom than men?
If limiting voting rights were beneficial, I wonder if limiting voting rights to married people might have similar benefits and be politically easier.
Also, I have long thought that current government employees should not be allowed to vote.
Political power in the hands of women is necessarily used for the oppression of men. You dont have to be a genius to know that an oppressed, depressed, powerless, fearful man is not a man, he is impotent. Men should feel in control, if not, they good for nothing.
Post a Comment