Dennis Mangan says:
It's permanent revolution everywhere, with the U.S. as the agitator and enforcer of the revolution. Even though no one in charge seems to have a clue as to what they're doing, whether the rebels are linked to Al Qaeda or the Muslim Brotherhood, and whether victory would really result in any kind of democracy - not necessarily a good outcome anyway - they rush in where angels fear to tread. The U.S. government is far from being run in the interests of the American people; it's being run in the interests of a globalist, revolutionary elite who just can't stand to leave a country alone.Exactly. His commenters are suggesting that we Jews are doing it. No denying it, some Jews are part of the movement and in the front of it, but shoot me and I cant see what good American permanent revolutionary agitation does to us.
14 comments:
I wonder if Mangan is trying to imply that Sarkozy is the French version of a "neocon Jew".
Sarkozy is of course neither a neoceon nor a proper Jew.
My English is not perfect, but I assume that "neocon" has lost its original "Commentary" meaning and is used for a wide range of sinister, formless, behind-the-scenes, nose-enhanced puppeteers.
So it's the "neocons" (as you say, code word for Jews - goyish conservatives are just plain cons, ex-leftist Jewish conservatives are neocons), eh? Hillary and Obama - surely they are neocons, right? They did not do this of their own accord, they let the French talk them into it, correct?
The funniest thing is the deafening silence of the leftist media now that Mr. Hope and Change Obama is doing exactly what the warmonger Bush did. Fierce moral urgency of change my ass.
K
BTW, the Russian revolution did not turn out to be good for the Jews of Russia either, but this did not stop a number of (non-observant) Jews from supporting it. The modern Jewish belief in "social justice" is often an exercise in self-flagellation - you back the cause BECAUSE it is against your own group interest. Still Jews are a small minority and did not bring about the Russian Revolution by themselves nor were they the decisive influence in the recent decisions re: Libya, etc.
K
I would say Obama never said anything substantial that would reveal him to be anything definie. He is just a nice and likeable fellow with good speaking ability.
Hillary is no doubt extreme leftist. She is not neo anything nor conservative.
No denying it, some Jews are part of the movement
France is led by Jews now?
I wonder if Mangan is trying to imply that Sarkozy is the French version of a "neocon Jew".
Sarkozy is of course neither a neoceon nor a proper Jew.
Yes Mangan blames Joooo. His elite Aryans want conservativism but can't because of mighty Joooooo.
Jooooooo under bed, Mangan.
Jooooooooo...
The key with Obama is to watch what he does, not what he says. On foreign policy, he really has no position - it's not his thing. But on domestic policy, he will, like the good law professor he is, lay out the alternatives in a reasonable way, offering a fair explanation of the conservative position. Then, like the good red diaper baby he is, he will choose the leftmost alternative.
K
They did not do this of their own accord, they let the French talk them into it, correct?
Europe is also controlled by American Joo per Mangan and fellow anti-semites. Thus, France's diplomacy is fault of American Joooooooo.
Still Jews are a small minority and did not bring about the Russian Revolution by themselves
Will Mangan ever blame Russian gentiles for October Revolution?
My English is not perfect, but I assume that "neocon" has lost its original "Commentary" meaning and is used for a wide range of sinister, formless, behind-the-scenes, nose-enhanced puppeteers.
It's even more than that. These people seem to have forgotten that the American right has always had a "moderate" wing. The neocons, such as they are, are merely a particular manifestation of that wing.
Wishy-washy moderates have always been around, but the neocon-haters act like the GOP was comprised entirely of Buchanan clones before the evil neocons took over in the 1980's.
The Rockefeller, or RINO wing of the Republican party has always been around - in fact it WAS the party before Goldwater and Reagan, when Republicanism was a Northern rather than a Southern based party.
But since when is Neocon synonymous with moderate? I would say neocon (when not used as a euphemism for "Jewish") means, in the foreign policy sphere, "interventionist" as opposed to the "isolationist"/ know nothing/McCarthy/Buchanan/anti-Semitic wing of the party and in the domestic sphere, tending toward the libertarian - keeping the government out of both social and economic meddling.
The Rockefeller wing was in favor of both - on social policy same as the Democrats only a little less so, and on economic policy in favor of Big Business. The Catholic/anti-Semitic wing is obsessed with abortion and guns and doesn't know anything about economics.
When Obama was elected, the Dems gleefully predicted that it would be impossible to keep all these conflicting wings under the tent of the Republican party but Obama has proven to be a "uniter" just as he said he would - all the wings are united in hatred of him and his incompetence and leftist policies.
K
-The Catholic/anti-Semitic wing...doesn't know anything about economics - seeing what the Rockefeller/Ford/Harvard set has wrought all over the the world with their calculated depredations, which does not exclude a dose of naivete I would say that, in this case ignorance is bliss. There really isn't much more to economics than the law of supply and demand.
BTW the "Trotsky look" is a reliable marker for egghead Communists who yearn to repeat their master's success.
Ivan
The Trotsky look has remained evergreen. If the fellow in the photo were to show up in the same haircut and with the same shirt at any cafe in Berkeley or Bologna today, he would fit right in.
K
OT: Korean Talmudists: http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-4046985,00.html
Today,Trotsky might be too right wing for Berkeley.
Anon.
Post a Comment