Jews are fighting a historic demographic war with Palestine natives to acquire majority and therefore international legitimacy for the existence of an ethnic Jewish country. Palestinians understand this very well and they are waging a persistent war against Israel. They have exceptionally high vegetative growth, but I doubt it is a managed phenomenon as Palestinians have demostrated that they are unable to act collectively, and much less in a complex social phenomenon (which even highly organized nations like Germany are unable to influence). What remains is the manipulation of demographic data for propaganda purposes, which they can do and do shamelessly.
As Ambassador Yoram Ettinger writes, the Palestinian Bureau of Statistics publishes numbers – which have yet to be audited by the US - that enable the Palestinian Authority to rob US taxpayers and those of other generous countries. Western foreign aid to the Palestinian Authority has been partly based on the highly ballooned number of Palestinians.
Moreover, the PCBS feeds demographic misperceptions, which constitute effective psychological terrorism, eroding optimism and confidence in the future of the Jewish State, and scaring Israel into sweeping concessions. These misperceptions undermine Israel’s national security policy and diplomacy, and they attempt to generate pessimism, causing a setback to Aliya, long-term planning and overseas investments in Israel.Israeli left that criticise ferociously Haredi fertility is objectively fighting on the Palestinian side. The left rules the media and makes much noise, but fortunately it has lost effective power in Israel.
In fact, the Westernization of Arab fertility has been consistent with Mid-East reality. According to the CIA Factbook, Iran’s fertility rate has plummeted to 1.9 babies per woman, Jordan – 3.4, Egypt – 2.97, Syria – 2.94, Saudi Arabia – 2.3, North Africa – 2, etc. Israel’s Jewish fertility rate – 3 births per woman and trending upward due to the secular fertility surge - is higher than all Arab countries, other than the Sudan (4.9), Yemen (4.6), Iraq (3.7) and Jordan (3.4).
8 comments:
Avidor Lieberman also hates Haredi.
There is no hate in politics, only interests.
We would be wise to learn from you.
But we wont, since we only react at the 11th hour, or even the 13th hour.
Anon.
This has been going on for a long time. My parents told me that in the refugee camps in Germany after the war, the leaders used to inflate the # of residents so that they could receive extra rations from UNRA. Then they would sell the rations (not only the extra but the greedy ones would sell all of them) on the black market and pocket the money. Meanwhile the refugees did not get enough to eat. Jewish leadership like this helped convince my parents NOT to make Aliyah and to move to America instead.
K
Israeli approach is a case study I think.
Studied it for a time.
In recent history it's the israeli and the brazilian approach which proved very succesful in keeping the land - I also bet on israel due to the arguments you presented above.
The failure - also case study - is the afrikaner approach in South Africa.
You have to decide if you want to keep an ethnical majority , and in this case you need to be modest, like israel. A small piece of land it's enough for that.
If you want to keep an enormous land mass and all it's wealth hmmmm need to increase demographic mass through active emmigration and as many as possible mixed children. Like in Brazil.
What I could observe through similitude is that israelis made all the rational steps brazilians made + rational behaviour ragarding what can safely taken and kept.
Compared to this the afrikaner example almost makes you puke. Not because of political correct moral arguments but due to it's sheer imbecility and idiotic greed. They wanted to keep everything for themselves and didn't intend to share absolutely anything with anyone. And of course wanted to keep all the pie.
In conclusion Israel and Brazil are two succesful colonial enterprises , two extremes of the spectre , and this makes comparison more interesting.
I wrote about this cases because the ethnical groups involved were extremly small in each case. Two survived and prospered , one is currently being hunted down violently. Case study each of them about survival in brutal lands - survival meaning grandchildren of your grandchildren still live there and are not being chased around.
The natural reality is that the smart and strong will rule the stupid and weak, for the benefit of both-the stupid and weak can't create or maintain the rule of law or complex infrastructure that are required for peace and prosperity. The case of South Africa (and Zimbabwe and every other European colony) could only happen within a reality distortion field emanating from D.C.
Well, I dont know the situation in South Africa, but maybe a small Afrikaner republic where ethnic Whites and mixed blood people are majority is still feasible. They could defend it easily against aggression.
Now is a little bit too late for afrikaners I think.
What you describe is an israeli scenario. They were too greedy to do it when they could.
And were also too greedy to share with emmigrants and mixed race people in order to keep all the land by using a brazilian/portuguese scenario.
Post a Comment