I had written a note on Israeli military courts ("Zahal's Big Mistake" - i.e. letting in the fierce evangelist of my daughter, with her non-negotiable dogmas on punishment of erring conscripts) but I'm not going to write anything - since things may be harmless in my mind but the malevolent enemy is watching. Better I analize the CIA's debate on intelligence theory, which is much more difficult than it appears.Some say that the task of intelligence is to analyze the errors and failures. I say the task of intelligence is to learn the reality around by active proving. I mean that the CIA world almanach is very good and I love to read it, but collecting data in not the way to learn how reality is. You learn only by changing it. How do you know where the limits are? Not by passive observation. Only by violating the rules you see if the rules are real rules or not. What we may see as a limit, an impassable obstacle, may probe to be a cloud if we have the courage of attacking it. Intelligence must be continuously attacking the impossible, trying in real action if one's suppositions are true or imagination alone.
I am a systematic violator of laws, rules and conventions. I walk on the grass. Sometimes I receive a knock on my head and make reverse, but most of the time reality is innoccous and softer than thought of. I follow the rule of the Austro-Hungarian army's bayonet fight: you meet solid, pull back, you meet soft, push ahead with all your might. That is my theory of intelligence work. Good as any.
America has been engaged in continuous fighting all over the world during my lifetime. They are following the Tao, the right way. I always liked America.







.png)

























.jpg)



