For the reality is that our two major political parties are engaged in a fierce struggle over the future shape of American society. Democrats want to preserve the legacy of the New Deal and the Great Society — Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid — and add to them what every other advanced country has: a more or less universal guarantee of essential health care. Republicans want to roll all of that back, making room for drastically lower taxes on the wealthy. Yes, it’s essentially a class war.I dont understand the intricancies of Obama's Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, but if Krugman says it is a class war, it is a class war for me too. American social classes are, to large extent, ethnic groups or races, with the descendants of North East Europeans and East Asians in the upper half, and the Mestizo and Mulatto majority in the bottom half. Therefore Krugman's class war is not the classic European social structure as analyzed by Marx, but a double class/race war more similar to a colonial pre-liberation situation.
Talkative old farts are always remembering boring and irrelevant anecdotes and I'm always true and never ashamed of my own nature. Under Rabin's Labor government, I was tangentially involved in large industrial parks in the North of the Gaza Strip, and another near Kever Benjamin. These parks (situated exactly in the border) intended to provide jobs and absorb Palestinian unemployed, without letting them enter into Israel proper. We Jews are good in economic development and these parks succeeded immediately and hundreds of factories moved into them employing tens of thousands of Palestinians. My interest was toxic wastewaters because Israel's strict ruled unenforced in them. I used to push myself aggressively into the center and did participate in many meetings.
One old halutz said that this was exactly the situation most feared by early Zionists: Jews settling in the country and establishing a typical colonial exploitation regime. That was unconceivable and for them, the end of Zionism. They had established their kibbutzim based on the rigid dogma of "Avoda Ivrit" - Hebrew Labor. No Jewish farm or factory would employ natives. Zionism's purpose was not to make Jews rich but to liberate them from the psychological and social ills of the Galuth. (pic. Rehovot, 1924)
In short time the industrial zones were dismounted, razed and never mentioned again.
Concluding: What seems to be developing in America is a class-cum-race segmentation, and according to Krugman, war. Some kind of internal colonial war. If I were American, I would be alarmed.

16 comments:
Luckily, America is not run by Yiddish speaking socialists (instead it's run by their grandchildren, but never mind).
America never had a doctrine of "Avoda Americanit". From the very earliest days, the premises of America was that the ruling whites would run things and that blacks, Irish, Italians, Poles, Chinamen, Hispanics, etc. (depending on the time and place) would do the actual dirty work - pick cotton, build railroads, work in the mines, etc. Following WWI, there was a relatively brief (45 year) interlude where few new immigrants were permitted, but there were still black, existing immigrants and guest worker programs for Mexicans, Caribbean workers, etc. and Puerto Ricans were considered American citizens and were free to come.
Do you honestly expect Rockefeller to cut his own lawn? I assume in Israel, Avoda Ivrit is also observed in the breach, or what are all those foreigners doing on construction sites, in nursing homes, etc.?
K
The ancient israelites: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/58/Ibscha.jpg
What is your opinion on Flavius Josephus?
Well, I slept on it and am more optimistic. Class/race exploitative societies exist in many places, specially in Latin America, and they last hundreds of years.
Pecunia non olet.
Anon.
I disagree K - there was and is very much an idea of Avoda Americanit. The Free Soil Movement is perhaps the most explicit political manifestation - but it's an old idea that runs from Puritanism and the Jeffersonian yeoman-as-ideal, down through the independent frontiersman, and even today's reverence of the "small business owner" and resentment of "big business." (Obviously, what we say and how we spend our money are two distinct things.)
The ruling class with slaves/employees/servants is probably, if you step back far enough, consistently the primary political opposition to Avoda Americanit. I think the battle is hardly decided one way or another, and maybe it can't be. There are too many people who are too strong to be dependent, and too many who are too weak to be independent.
I don't think it's primarily an ethnic issue in the USA (after all, these dynamics play out even in the all-English regions of the country), but I agree that a certain ethnic mix helps the tip the battle in one direction or another.
Jeffersonian yeoman-as-ideal, ..
Jefferson was the original American hypocrite. He had hundreds of slaves and lived in a palatial mansion. His political descendants are Al Gore and Johnny Edwards.
K
American history since the frontier was closed (and maybe since the Revolution) can be summarized as constant class warfare of a section of the upper class allied with the mob against the middle class. Avodah americanit was a non-starter, since the people opposed to it controlled the media and government completely. Take that, rednecks!
The class warfare in Israel will be settled by the fact that the lower-class degenerates and upper-class effete fags will fail to reproduce and die out or emmigrate, and the religious middle classes will inherit the land, which we already see happening in the military.
There are plenty of religious among the poor, and they breed. Their unsupportable surplus may become the next lower-class degenerates. The real question for Israel once it is dominated by the religious will be how the ordinary religious deal with the crazy religious Zealots. It didn't work out so well last time.
The Israeli religious poor are not lower class. They are classical middle class bourgeois in their family values, tastes, etc.
2000 years have passed since the Zealots.
Class has both an economic component and a values component. Their family values are not degenerate, but their incomes are lacking. If jobs in the future are limited to the point that some among the large brood of children can't support themselves financially, they and whatever progeny they have will be at risk for degeneracy.
If we get hit with a meteor, all these problems will be passe.
Al Gore has surpassed himself this time, even for connoisseurs of hypocrisy.
Anon.
I shudder to think that this pig might have become President along with Edwards. They would have turned the White House back into a Kennedyesque brothel.
K
Isn't it lovely how Democrat plutocrats like Gore, Edwards and H.R. Clinton expound on the need for people who make more than $200k, i.e. "the wealthy," to pay their fair share in taxes? Gore was already worth more than $100 million before the Current TV deal with Oil-Jazeera, some fraction of it inherited from his parents. The Gores weren't poor even when Al was a boy.
I think Gore's father started out poor but by the time he was done being a Senator he wasn't anymore. Isn't it funny how these guys who are supposedly "doing good" for us end up "doing well" for themselves instead? And since when does America have a hereditary aristocracy where parents are succeed by their children , husbands by their wives, etc.?
K
Post a Comment