Wednesday, January 30, 2013

I'll meet him in the courtroom


My little daughter does not eat Army food so she wakes up half an hour early to prepare her lunchbox and to read the morning fishwrap HaAretz. What is an 18 years old girl interested in? Schmattes? Celebs? No, the first thing she searches are criminal and legal notes with uniforms involved. Sometimes she observes: "I met him yesterday in court", or "This one is sure to appear today". Today she read about our neighbor Gabi Ashkenazi, former IDF Chief of Staff, being investigated by the Military Police by order of the Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein in connection to the Harpaz affair, an office intrigue between Ashkenazi and his boss, the Minister of Defense Ehud Barak. "Hmmm", she said, "this tik (case) is for the Kiryah". That is, the High Military Court in Tel Aviv. She doesnt talk but I think she has been promoted to serve there instead of the desertor hashishnik rabble court. I dont ask.  

17 comments:

teo said...

Proud father you are J.
I hope to be as fulfilled as you.

Anonymous said...

I say to you, I certainly get annoyed...

when spambots post random nonsense followed by links.

K

Anonymous said...

Chicago is the NWO endgame... israeli jews over non-white.

Anonymous said...

I'm very disappointed. I thought this blog attracted a better quality of anti-Semite.

K

J said...

I'm sorry I cant offer you of the better kind. May be here is no better kind.

Anonymous said...

Steve Sailer moderate's comments on his blog. You should consider doing likewise J. Or perhaps change blogs to one with IP banning capabilities.

Anonymous said...

Considering the comments that make it through Sailer's filter, I shudder to think of the ones that don't.

Anonymous said...

I haven't noticed much beyond mild anti-semitism over at Sailer. Accusing Jews of promoting multiculturalism is the usual canard played, nothing too sinister. Sometimes a nasty comment slips through, maybe an accompanying link to Kevin McDonald's site. Sailer himself, being of anglo stock, is difficult to troll. Reminds me of a Louis CK joke.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TG4f9zR5yzY

B said...

Maybe I'm not attuned to these things, being Scots-Irish, but I haven't noticed any overt antisemitism in Sailer's comments section.

Anonymous said...

A lot of the anti-Semitism at Sailer is the backhanded kind - the Jews are clever at protecting their own interests and manipulating public perception. Why can't we white people emulate them? Admittedly this is a better quality of Antisemitism than the f*ck the Jews type of graffiti that has been popping up here, but if anything that makes it more dangerous because it seems so calm and rational on the surface.

K

Anonymous said...

Although I understand the concerns, it should also be appreciated that non-Jews have as much right to discuss Jewish issues, as Jews have to comment on non-Jewish issues.

As it currently stands, non-Jews are intimidated from speaking even reasonable opinions and this is not a healthy situation.

Furthermore, this censorship-regime has clearly become generalized so that white gentiles cannot even utter an opinion about ANY other race or ethnic group without opening themselves up for accusations of racism or whatever.

Consequently, we have a choice: either shut up and accept the degradation in our world status, or fight back.

I think debate is better than a bottled-up pressure cooker type situation, and furthermore, I think that wise Jews will accept and even value the more civilized commentary that one finds on certain websites, even if they do not agree with it, while rightfully criticizing the nasty and stupid crap that appears on other sites.

Much of the nasty stuff is inane, wrong and self-degrading anyway.

Anon.

Anonymous said...

The problem is that it's hard to tell the reasonable people from the crazies. I'm sure you've had the experience where you start talking with someone and they sound normal enough but then they tell you that their mind is controlled by rays from the CIA and they show you the tinfoil lining in their hat. That's the feeling that I get from some of these guys. They say a few reasonable things and then they say that Jews should not be allowed to vote.

K

Anonymous said...

You are correct, it is hard sometimes to tell who might be motivated by irrational hatred, as some clearly are, but it is still not, on balance, a good idea to try to suppress our speech and thought.

The really weird experiences happen to me in the Middle East, when conversing with what seems to be a perfectly reasonable person, who then descends quickly into apoplexy, paranoia and venom when the subject of Israel comes up.

This sort of extreme case is not so common in the West, but many of us are not happy when others (of whatever group) seem to exert undue influence over our destiny, in a negative way, while carefully tending to their own. If you look at the West, it is not being run in the interests of whites as such, and has not been since the 1950's. It is a biological program to get upset; unavoidable, I think, and by no means unique to us.

It has to be managed intelligently; which is not currently the case.

However, I am enormously heartened by overt and growing Jewish support for whites who oppose mass third world immigration into the West, whether out of self-interest or not. It is the one bright spot.

Anon.

Anonymous said...

You are correct, it is hard sometimes to tell who might be motivated by irrational hatred, as some clearly are, but it is still not, on balance, a good idea to try to suppress our speech and thought.

The really weird experiences happen to me in the Middle East, when conversing with what seems to be a perfectly reasonable person, who then descends quickly into apoplexy, paranoia and venom when the subject of Israel comes up.

This sort of extreme case is not so common in the West, but many of us are not happy when others (of whatever group) seem to exert undue influence over our destiny, in a negative way, while carefully tending to their own. If you look at the West, it is not being run in the interests of whites as such, and has not been since the 1950's. It is a biological program to get upset; unavoidable, I think, and by no means unique to us.

It has to be managed intelligently; which is not currently the case.

However, I am enormously heartened by overt and growing Jewish support for whites who oppose mass third world immigration into the West, whether out of self-interest or not. It is the one bright spot.

Anon.

Anonymous said...

Look, political correctness is a modern affliction - there are a LOT of things that you are not allowed to discuss in public. The lack of ability to honestly discuss the pros and cons of Jews is the least of anyone's problems in the US (because Jews are a small and declining minority and because (unless you are one of the aforementioned nuts) there is really very little that can or should be done in a democracy to "reduce Jewish influence". On the other hand, the other off-limits groups are at the root of most of the major social problems in the US - crime, the "crisis in the school", dependence on government benefits, etc. Since it is impossible to have any honest discussion about these problems, the prescriptions that emerge are naturally totally off base. Hundreds of young people are murdered by pistols in our big cities but instead we worry about scary looking rifles wielded by scary white men because this is all we are allowed to talk about.

K

B said...

>Hundreds of young people are murdered by pistols

Yes, it's a tragedy-those pistols, walking around, listening to their obnoxious pistol music, up to no good, selling drugs and killing young people. Oh, the drugs are also killing young people, too.

Anonymous said...

LOL. After a while you internalize the desire to avoid crimethink and speak in Newspeak out of habit.

Yesterday's priceless NYT headline:

"Strict Chicago Gun Laws Can't Stem Fatal Shots"

Who's thinking irrationally now?

K