"Paternity testing has been banned in France for the past 15 years and for French fathers to truly set their mind at ease, they would have had to secretively send samples to foreign paternity testing labs. If those samples were found in the post by officials on their way to foreign laboratories, the French men who sent them could theoretically face a year in prison and a 15,000 Euro fine. This year the ban was challenged but the French Government decided to uphold and maintain the anti-paternity testing law.
The reasons for which the Government said the ban should remain were related to the preservation of peace within French families. According to some online articles, Germany, has also banned (or plans to ban) paternity testing for similar reasons. French psychologists suggest that fatherhood is determined by society not by biology. For this reason, the President's wife Carla Bruni describes her father as the man 'from whom she takes her name'. She is friends with her biological dad too but she doesn't refer to him, or think of him as, her father."
Source
This reminds me the Jewish law that rules that the children of married women are all kosher and presumed of her husband. I heard stories of rabbis purposefully confusing things and cheating to avoid declaring a child
mamzer (bastard) although the husband had been dead for the last ten months.
16 comments:
But if the baby born with a dark skin?
Explain.
the mommy had jungle fever.
These are the kind of rules that are put in place if you put women in charge of your society.
K
True.
They are building a society based on opacity and lies. Ultimately it can be maintained only by violence.
Humans are actually incapable of constructing a society based upon true equality - equality of races, of gender, etc. Rather, it is just a question of who gets to rule. Before it was men over women, so now it must be women ruling over men. Before whites were preferred to blacks, so now blacks must be preferred to whites. Lenin was right - its all who/whom.
K
Jean Raspail who wrote the book Camp of the saints said that the Republic (state) is the enemy of the historical nation.
I would like to speak more about Django Unchained as an exemplar of where America stands today. On one hand, blacks attack lower and middle class whites with impunity. On the other hand, upper class whites make a movie showcasing imaginary atrocities committed against blacks by whites at great length, then glorifying black violence against whites.
Imagine a movie about the vile outrages committed by Jews against Aryans and a Nordic avenger fighting for justice.
I wonder how many whites are going to get their teeth stomped out or be raped/murdered by blacks hopped up on self-righteousness after watching Django. I also wonder if there will be any lawsuits against Tarantino.
Don't be stupid. Barack Obama is the President. That's all you need to know.
K
Sailer has taken up the mantle of who/whom. I don't agree with him about everything, but he's very perceptive about some things.
Not even an unsuccessful lawsuit, K?
The picture is of Sasha Baron Cohen playing a gay guy who adopts a black baby. He's making fun of White celebrities who do that.
It's not an issue of paternity.
Imagine a movie about the vile outrages committed by Jews against Aryans and a Nordic avenger fighting for justice.
The Weinstein brothers will not be producing that one.
I wonder how many whites are going to get their teeth stomped out or be raped/murdered by blacks hopped up on self-righteousness after watching Django. I also wonder if there will be any lawsuits against Tarantino.
Blacks don't need a movie to motivate them to do any of that.
Some time soon, there will come a great reckoning.
Anon.
Some time soon, there will come a great reckoning.
Anon.
Zo Sprache Nietzsche.
An unsuccessful lawsuit? Sure, no problem. Any fool or crank can file a lawsuit that will be tossed out.
K
Post a Comment